Tuesday, 8 June 2021

Covid-19 Contribution to English Language; Corona Virus

 

how has recent ongoing Pandemic phenomenon contributed
to English?
 

The corona virus-related updates give us a glimpse into how language can quickly alter within the face of unequalled social and economic disturbance. For example, one among the outcomes of the pandemic is that it’s brought previously unknown medical jargons to the forefront of everyday speech. Apart from this, it also contributed a lot of new jargons to English and Urdu languages.
Usually, the editors of dictionaries include a novel science related and technical terms as long as they acquire a certain point of currency outside of their disciplines. This is usually true for the names of medicines, since there are a lot of themFor example, there are Ritalin and Oxycontin present in the dictionary, but not Aripiprazole.
However, the pandemic has seen a minimum of two drug names that got into the public daily discourse.
Hydroxychloroquine, an ailment for malaria recommended by some doctors as a treatment against the virus, was added to the Oxford English Dictionary in July, although the name of the drug had already appeared in print as early as 1951.
Another new drug is dexamethasone, this is a corticosteroid that has said to reduced the COVID-19 fatality rate. It appeared in print in 1958 and was included in the dictionary.

 Similarly words that are associated with social distancing or social isolation were there long before the COVID-19 pandemic, but they’ve become very common in 2020.
Self-isolate, self-isolated and shelter in situ all received new citations for their current usage.
Furthermore, ‘elbow bump’ has advanced from a gesture like a high-five, as documented in 1981, to its present form: a secure thanks to greet another person.
Some regional differences also are emerging in COVID-19 language. Self-isolate has been the well-liked term in British English, whereas self-quarantine is more commonly employed within the U.S. “Rona” or “the rona” as slang for coronavirus has been observed within the U.S. and Australia.

The COVID-19 pandemic has produced so many new words that are blends of other words. For example, “maskne,” an acne outbreak caused by facial coverings; “zoombombing,” which is when a lot of people invade zoom video conferences; and “quarantini,” a cocktail consumed in isolation.
Other new blends include “covidiot,” for someone who ignores public safety recommendations; “doomscrolling,” which happens when you skim anxiety-inducing pandemic-related stories on your smartphone; and the German term “hamsterkauf,” or panic buying.


The London School of Linguistics; Henry Sweet, Daniel Jones, J. Rupert Firth.

 

The London School

Introduction

The London School of Linguistics is involved with the study of language on the descriptive plane (synchrony), the distinguishing of structural (syntagmatic) and systemic (paradigmatic) concepts, and the social aspects of language. Semantics is in the forefront.

The school’s primary contribution to linguistics has been the situational theory of meaning in semantics (the dependence of the meaning of a linguistic unit on its use in a standard context by a definite person; functional variations in speech are distinguished on the basis of typical contexts) and the prosodic analysis in phonology (the consideration of the phenomena accruing to a sound: the number and nature of syllables, the character of sound sequences, morpheme boundaries, stress, and so on).

 The distinctive function is considered to be the primary function of a phoneme. The London school rejects the concepts of the speech collective and social experience and studies the speech of the individual person; it is subject to terminological and methodological inaccuracy and proves in many aspects to be linguistics of speech and not language.

The London School of Linguistics had three main representatives:

• Henry Sweet (1845 - 1912)

As a philologist, he specialized in the Germanic languages, particularly Old English and Old Norse. In addition, Sweet published works on larger issues of phonetics and grammar in language and the teaching of languages. Many of his ideas have remained influential, and a number of his works continue to be in print, being used as course texts at colleges and universities.

• Daniel Jones (1881 - 1967)

British phonetician, He was involved in the development of the International Phonetic Alphabet from 1907 and went on to invent the system of cardinal vowels and produce the English Pronouncing Dictionary (1917).

 • John Rupert Firth (1890 - 1960):

Commonly known as J. R. Firth, was an English linguist. He worked in the phonetics department of University College London before moving to the School of Oriental and African Studies, where he became Professor of General Linguistics, a position he held until his retirement in 1956.

 British Structuralism Daniel Jones took up and extended Sweet’s work on phonetics. His work was highly influential in the development of phonetics, and his books Outline of English phonetics and English pronouncing dictionary were widely used throughout the world.

But general linguistics in Britain really began with the work of J.R. Firth, who held the first chair in linguistics, in the University of London, from 1944 to 1956. Firth, who had lived for some time in India and studied its languages, brought a number of original and provocative perspectives to linguistics; the tradition he established is called the ‘London School’. Among other things, he questioned the assumption that speech can be divided into segments of sound strung one after the other, regarding this as an artifact of alphabetic scripts used by westerners.

His theory of prosodic analysis focused on phonetic elements larger than individual sounds, and anticipated some developments in phonology by half a century. Firth was also deeply concerned with meaning, and, influenced by the Polish anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski (1884–1942), developed (at least in outline) a contextual theory of meaning that accorded a crucial role to use in context –embodied in the aphorism ‘meaning is use in context’.

 Firth did not develop a fully articulated theory of grammar, but rather laid out the framework on which a theory could be developed. One of his students, Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday (often M.A.K. Halliday) (1925–) was responsible for elaborating Firth’s ideas and developing them into a coherent theory of language. From the late 1950s, Halliday refined a theory that ultimately came to be known as systemic functional grammar; Halliday’s ideas have attracted a considerable amount of attention, especially in applied linguistics, and the tradition he began is represented in Britain, Australia, America, Spain, China, and Japan.

But Firth’s ideas were developed in other ways as well, including by other students, and their students. In fact, Firth’s singular approach remains a source of inspiration to many, and has spawned a range of neo-Firthian theories.

 

Tuesday, 1 June 2021

Stylistic analysis (Foregrounding) of E.E. Cummings “In the Rain”

 

Stylistic analysis (Foregrounding) of E.E. Cummings “In the Rain”



Abstract

This work aims at studying the distinctive style of E.E Cummings poetry in his poem “In The Rain”. The stylistic study of a poet’s work helps to indentify and trace a his inclination and style of work. In this research, linguistic aspects of the poem are discussed with the technique of foregrounding. The poem is fore grounded in respect to deviations and parallelisms. The poem is also fore grounded on graph logical, syntactical, grammatical, lexical, phonological and semantic levels. These levels are very helpful in finding out the love theme of the poem and are being discussed here in this piece of research.

 

Introduction

Stylistics is the study of style in texts. The way a text is being written and organized is being discussed in the waste field of stylistic. Stylistics is a branch of applied linguistics and it focuses on the figures, tropes, and other rhetorical devices used to provide variety and distinctness to someone’s writing.

As Leech puts it, “style is the way in which something is spoken, written or performed‖”. Style is the usage of words choices and the way a writer uses them in order to achieve a certain aim and goal through his or her writing. Style is being defined as the selection of words from a huge linguistic vocabulary. Style covers spoken and written, literary and nonliterary kinds of language but it is specifically concerned with the literary texts. So it is the way that a writer uses to deliver his message.

 

Principles of Stylistics 

 There are certain rules and principles almost in every discipline that are being used to define the areas of that particular discipline.  In stylistics too there is a yardstick to evaluate the linguistic features of a literary text. There are mainly three principles for the stylistic analysis of a text. 

1)      Foregrounding 2)      Norms 3)      Deviations

  Foregrounding is the antonym of back grounding. In back grounding technique, we explore and identify those features of the txt that are hidden and unidentified. This technique is very much closer to Critical Discourse Analysis. In contrast to that, Foregrounding is the study of the apparent and vivid features of the text. By this technique, we tend to identify the underlined and highlighted features of a text. In Halliday’s language, it is called ‘Prominence’. This is further consisted of two techniques: Parallel Foregrounding and Deviational Foregrounding. 

Parallelism is the analysis of revised alike patterns in a text. Deviation is the violation of evident design of the text.

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE POEM

 

The poem ‘In the rain’ is written by Edward Estlin Cummings, famously known as E.E. Cummings, was an American poet who is well known for his unique poetic style. His writing style is very much unconventional and different than other writer’s, especially in poetry. For example, he used the lowercase letters in his name to make it distinguished from others.   

Deviations play a crucial part in the theme of a poem, and Cummings’ poetry is full of them. For example His capitalization is not a something very traditional. He never used it in the start of sentence and when he used it, it gives extra meanings to the poem.

Furthermore, he never capitalized “I” that falls under the category of grammatical deviation but, it also demonstrates that one’s ‘self’ is not always very important. He proclaims the notion to his readers that one should escape his self’ and think about the others too. He did not use punctuation marks in their conventional way. But they are used very unconventionally in his poems. He never uses sentence markers and that is also a deviation of generally accepted norms of English language.   

FOREGROUNDING “IN THE RAIN” 

The poem is being analyzed using the technique of foregrounding.

The features of the poem “In the Rain” by E.E Cummings are being traced on these six levels of Stylistic Analysis:

1)  Graphological level.  2) Grammatical level.        3)  Syntactic level.        4)  Lexical level.           5) Phonological level.         6) Semantic level.

1) Graphological Level 

“It refers to the whole writing system: punctuation and paragraphing as well as spacing”. Graphological levels play a major role in the analysis of the text. They carry “pragmatic force” as an important factor in a text. Graphology is very important in understanding of a text.

The poem is divided into six stanzas in which four stanzas of the poem consist of four lines and one is of two lines. The patterns of lines are very fiddly. The length of all the lines is not the same and is different. There is an awkward spacing in the poem. Punctuations are used to divide sentences or phrases e.g. full stops, commas, semi-colon, colon, exclamation mark, apostrophe, parenthesis and brackets etc. But there is only one full stop in the whole poem. There are two commas in the whole poem; also, the title of the poem is in lower case which is a deviation.

There is no capitalization in the beginning of the sentence, not even one capital word is there in the whole poem. The paragraph spacing is very much awkward. “I” the personal pronoun is used twice in the poem and it is used in lower case which is also a deviation.

Grammatical Level 

There is no capitalization in the beginning of the sentences of the poem. The sentences aren’t ending with a full stop and there is no sentence marker being used. Only one full stop is observed in the whole poem. No punctuation is there except two commas that are used in the whole poem. The personal pronoun “I” is being used in lower cases throughout the poem. 

The line patterns are not in accordance to the language norms, they are rather unusual. Line spacing is very awkward. Paragraph spacing also violates language norms and is used very awkwardly. The whole sentence structure is some kind of deviation forms the normal rules and norms of the grammar.

Lexical level:

The theme of the poem is being fore grounded by the use of vocabulary.  For example there are love epithets that represent the love theme of the poem:

                                                                         “Think of you”, “the holy

                                                                      city which is your face”,

                                                                          “your eyes half-  

                                                                                thrush          

                                                                  half-angel and your drowsy           

                                                               lips where float flowers of kiss”

 

 

Phonological Level:

Phonological level deals with the pattern of sound used in a text. Lets discuss the poem on phonological for grounding level

Rhyme Scheme: the rhyme scheme of the poem is absent.  Consonance is found in the poem. For example in stanza one, “sunset” and “sit” are consonance sounds. In stanza two, “streets” and “smiles” are consonance sounds. Similarly, in the last stanza,  “Song”, “soul,” “single” and “Star” are all the consonance sounds. Example of Repetition is also found in the poem. There is a repetition of the line, “think of you” in the poem.  

 Alliteration: There are various examples of alliteration. For example: ‘Float flowers’, ‘single star’ ‘song soul’.

Semantic Level 

This poem is fore grounded on the level of semantic because it has many semantic parallelisms and deviations. There are various examples of metaphor “In the Rain”:

                                                                                 “the holy

                                                                   city which is your face”

         these lines are also the example of metaphor.

                                                              Your little cheeks the streets”

                                                                              Of smiles

        Another example of metaphor is in third stanza:

                                                            “your eyes half-

                                                           Thrush half angel”

 Metaphors of ‘city’ and ‘street’ are not usually used in poetry to relate the ‘beauty of mistress’. But Cummings does this and giving a very unique touch to his poems. Thrush is a singing bird he puts the word ‘half’ with it and makes a new word which is used as a metaphor to relate the beauty of her beloved’s eye. Similarly, ‘half- angel’ is used to describe the beauty of her lips. The beloved’s hair is related with the metaphor of ‘pirouette’ which is also very unusual because ‘pirouette’ is a part of dance.

Hyperbole

 Hyperbole is used by E.E Cummings to overstate the beauty of his beloved. He calls the eyes of her mistress as ‘half-angel and half thrush’.

 

Key concepts of Pierre Bourdieu

 

Key concepts of Pierre Bourdieu

 



Theory of practice, their definitions and examples:

 

1.      Cultural capital

Bourdieu developed the concept of cultural capital in the late 1960s when studying the French educational system.

Cultural capital comprises the social assets of a person (education, intellect, style of speech, style of dress, etc.) that promote social mobility in stratified society.

Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital was heavily influenced by the theories of Karl Marx.

Sharing similar forms of cultural capital with others creates a sense of collective identity and group position i.e. the identity of “people like us”.

There are certain forms of cultural capital which are valued over others, and can help or hinder one’s social mobility just as much as income or wealth.

Bourdieu noticed that middle-class students tended to persist through school, while working-class students had higher dropout rates. This happens because schools operated based on the culture of the dominant class, and expected all students to be knowledgeable of it. They might not be viewed as favorable by teachers; they might not understand materials or assignments that were based on the dominant culture. Thus they might opt out of education themselves.

He further had gave three forms of cultural capital namely: 1) Embodied 2) Objectified 3) Institutionalized.

 

2.      Habitus

Habitus refers to the physical embodiment of cultural capital. It is the deeply ingrained habits, skills, and dispositions that we posses due to our life experiences.

Bourdieu often used sports metaphors “feel for the game” when talking about the habitus.

He further said that in the right situations, our habitus allows us to successfully navigate social environment. It also extends to our “taste” for cultural objects such as art, food, and clothing.

Bourdieu often noted, that habitus was so ingrained that people often mistook the feel for the game as natural instead of culturally developed.   

In one of his major works, Distinction, Bourdieu links French citizens’ tastes in art to their social class positions, forcefully arguing that aesthetic sensibilities are shaped by the culturally ingrained habitus.  This often leads to justifying social inequality, because it is believed that some people are naturally disposed to the finer things in life while others are not.

 

3.      Field

Bourdieu understood the social world as being divided up into a variety of distinct arenas or “fields” of practice like art, education, religion, law etc., each with their own unique set of rules, knowledge, and forms of capital.

Each field has its own set of positions and practices, as well as its struggles for position as people mobilize their capital to stake claims within a particular social domain.

Much like a baseball or football field, social fields are places where people struggle for position and play to win.

 

4.      Symbolic power

 

Power is seldom exercised as overt physical force. According to Bourdieu, symbolic power is an invisible power which is misrecognized as such and thereby recognizes as legitimate.

 

 

A stylistic analysis of the poem, “maggie and milly and moggy and may” By: E E Cummings

 

Introduction

There is no doubt in the fact that linguistics as an independent field and discipline, is rapidly growing day by day. Its rapid growth as an independent field of study and its accurate application to the literary study and criticism has opened new perspectives in the field of criticism especially in the twentieth century.

According to the dictionary definition of Stylistics, it means “the science of literary style” and “the art of forming good style in writing”

Stylistics, as a scientific discipline, not only critically analyze the text for the purpose of its understanding, but also scrutinizes and identifies different aspects of the language used and make it easy for the readers to fully understand and interpret it. This feature of stylistics brings it closer to practical criticism. Stylistics plays an important role in the reader response theory and reception theory as well. There would hardly be any field of critical approach where stylistics won’t have an impact on that field or a role to play there.

Apart from Linguistic tools of modern criticism and linguistic insights, Stylistics also gives an objective analysis of the text and provides with useful and meaningful insights about the language used in that text.

With these characteristics of objective analysis, linguistics makes it possible for us to fully interpret a text using stylistic devices and techniques, in order to enjoy any literature. This way, the importance of stylistics cannot be ignored by any student or academia.

Now as it is clear to us that the linguistic analysis of the language of literature is stylistics. The term ‘style’ is somehow misleading for many. As the word ‘style’ was attributed once with the language varieties, for example religious language, academic language, legal language, etc. but now, both these varieties are called registers. Also, both have somehow gained a specialized, but narrow employment of linguistics which is being applied to literature.  So the importance of stylistics in literary texts is many folded and cannot be ignored at all.

Introduction to the poet:

Edward Estlin Cummings, usually written as e e Cummings, was an American poet, essayist, painter, author, and playwright. He born in October 14, 1894, in Massachusetts, United States and died at September 3, 1962. He has written more than a hundred books. His famous works are ‘The Enormous Room’, ‘Tulips and Chimneys, and his ‘selected poems’.

e e Cummings was truly believed to be the representative of the American modern experimental poets. e e Cummings is widely known for his own unique style of writing and manipulating the language for his own sake. Some critics have remarked about Cummings’ style that “chewing the conventional rhymes and syntactic structure of poems and even rejecting to transfer information and emotion in the way of conventional printing. In other words, He has his own method of writing poetry and has special peculiarities in handling language in his own way”.

 

 

Text of the poem:

 maggie and milly and molly and may

went down to the beach(to play one day)

and maggie discovered a shell that sang
so sweetly she couldn't remember her troubles,and

milly befriended a stranded star
whose rays five languid fingers were;

and molly was chased by a horrible thing
which raced sideways while blowing bubbles:and

may came home with a smooth round stone
as small as a world and as large as alone.

For whatever we lose(like a you or a me)
it's always ourselves we find in the sea

 

Linguistic Analysis of the poem:

 

If we look at the Rhyme Scheme of the poem, we see that it is like this

AABCDDEFGGHH

Furthermore there is a breakdown of the particular Rhyme Scheme of the poem between the lines (3-4) and 9(7-8) of the poem. Also, a kind of parallelism is being found between the lines (3-7) and (4-8) of the poem. These lines are ending with (troubles, and---bubbles, and).

 

Now the poem has been analyzed in the following lines using the foregrounding techniques:

1. Analysis at the Phonological level:

As it seems that the poem’s Rhyme is of nursery level as it is written for the children, so the use of alliterations are widely found in the poem. Alliteration is used for the purpose of rhythm and music. The following are used in the poems:

1.      maggie and milly and moggy and may

2.      so sweetly

3.      stranded star

4.      five languid fingers

5.      blowing bubbles

6.      a smooth round stone

The examples of rhyme, end rhyme, and internal rhyme are there at the phonological level:

(may-day), (stone-alone), me-sea) etc.

The basic foot that is being used in this foot is Iamb, along with some changes and variations

The patterns of the stress and unstressed syllables are of ‘ictus’ (/) and ‘remiss’(x) style

             /    x        /   x       /        x       /

  maggie and milly and moggy and may

 

The repetition of ‘and’ is due to the production of a typical rhyme scheme usually found in the children’s poems.  1-2-9-3 is the number of syllables line wise.

The same number of syllables in almost every line has helped to form the rhyme of the poem, making the poem an outstanding nursery rhyme poem, suited for children.

2. Analysis at the Morphological level:

The vocabulary used in the poem has been taken mostly used in the language of the children. The words are selected from the day to day use of the children. For example the words that is of more attraction to the kids or the jargons that are mostly related to children’s games and toys etc. the purpose of using such words is to evoke a certain phenomenon which is mostly related to the word of children. For example these following words create a certain kind of realm that is related to children.

“Beach – sea – stranded – star – shell – sing – horrible thing – round stone – bubbles – blowing- Sang-not remember troubles, befriended- chased.”

Similarly the repetition of the word ‘and’ in the first line of the poem distinguishes the four characters and also creates some sort of separate realms for these characters; hence it also groups them in a certain way. Where those specific words are creating an atmosphere say a beach where the kids are playing and helping each other simultaneously.

3. Analysis at the Syntactic level:

The graph logical deviation is there in line 11 “like a you or me”, (personal pronouns are the head of noun phrases), and similarly there is a deviation in the line “As small as a world and as long as alone” where the word ‘alone’ is used for the sake of comparison. Also, there is a dislocation in the line “Whose rays five languid fingers were”. Also it is worth noticing that some of these lines are embedded in the parenthesis, like (to play one day) etc, or the use of indefinite article ‘a’ as a modifier in the line “like a you or me” as to mean “a you or a me”.

 

Examples of parallel structure in the poem are:

1. maggie discovered a shell                         S.V.O

2. milly befriended a stranded star                S.V.O

3. we loose                                                     S.V

4. we find                                                       S.V

 

4. Analysis at the Graphological level:

One of the most important aspects of Cummings’ poetry is the aspect of Capitalization. Although he is famous for his deviant form of writing poetry, hence he does so by violation most of the structure of capitalization and punctuations. He simply does not care for the capitalization of certain words like he writes proper nouns (including his own name) in all small letters, or putting or even not putting a single punctuation even if needed. Here in this poem too, he has neglected the need of capitalizing the proper nouns like maggie, molly, milly etc and didn’t start his sentences with a capital letter.

So these and other untold aspects of the poem, like the use of figurative language etc, were some of aspects of linguistics used by the poet in the poem that were analyzed in most easy way, in order to fully grasp the linguistic notions used in the poem and to understand the poem lucidly.

 

Featured post

Some Hidden Facts of John Milton's Life

John Milton, the renowned English poet and writer, led a fascinating life filled with remarkable achievements and intriguing aspects. Here a...